🚢 CPR questions necessity of national poll on cruise dock facility

Members of the Cruise Port Referendum (CPR) movement are raising questions about the necessity of a national poll on a cruise dock facility when there is no actual project for voters to consider. The group, which previously secured significant support for a vote on a cruise project, has pointed out the limited time for a campaign, the absence of appropriate legislation, and the costs involved as reasons for the government not to rush into a vote. The CPR has requested a meeting with Tourism Minister Kenneth Bryan to discuss their concerns about the plans for a poll on the broad question of whether to have a pier or not. 🚢

The CPR believes that a government-initiated referendum is not binding on current or future governments, and without a pressing need for a project, there is no justification for a referendum this year. The group has also highlighted the risks and volatility of the cruise line industry, demonstrated by the Covid-19 pandemic, and the need for a sustainable cruise tourism sector that does not compromise the environment. The group has criticized the allocation of CI$1.2 million for the referendum, suggesting that combining the two votes would reduce the cost by as much as half. They also argue that holding the referendum at the same time as the general election would allow greater participation and give more people the opportunity to have their say. 🗳️

According to the CPR, the rush to hold the referendum could exclude eligible voters not already registered to vote. The group also noted that the snap referendum gives the public very little time to consider the pros and cons of voting. The CPR is advocating for the adoption of official legislation for referendums and binding regulations to ensure a fair campaign with equal government funding given to both sides of the issue. The group is now seeking volunteers to help with their new campaign. 📢